[Note: This month's newsletter was prepared and authored by Thomas Ginty, CFP(R), one of our wealth advisors]

Clients & friends -

Happy Halloween! Our jack-o-lanterns are carved, and our costumes are ready. With near record high temperatures here in the northeast, it’s setting up to be a great night for trick-or-treating. This is one of my favorite times of year, as we embrace the vibrant colors of fall and the excitement of the holiday season to come. It’s a great time to reflect on the year that’s gone by and prepare for what’s ahead and to review your financial goals and year end checklist – charitable giving, IRA required minimum distributions, retirement contributions, etc.

It’s also, of course, an important time of year politically. With just days to go until the presidential election on November 5, polls suggest it will be a close race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Both candidates are campaigning hard in swing states, and investors may be worried about how either outcome might affect their portfolios. In this environment, it’s important for investors to prevent politics from derailing their long-term financial plans. In this month’s newsletter, we’ll share some historical context around the impact of elections on the economy.

Happy Halloween!

Tom

As citizens, voters, and taxpayers, the result of this election could have important implications for our everyday lives. However, putting political preferences aside, this is not necessarily true when it comes to your portfolio. In fact, history shows that the markets and economy tend to impact the result of elections, and not the other way around. Thus, it’s important to vote at the ballot box and not with our hard-earned savings.

Tax policy is uncertain, especially relating to estate planning

Perhaps the most complex area when it comes to the outcome of the election is tax policy. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) is set to expire at the end of 2025, leaving the future of individual and corporate taxes unclear and creating a so-called “tax cliff.” The candidates differ in their approaches to corporate taxes, individual rates, capital gains, tax credits, and more.

It’s important to maintain perspective around tax policy since these issues can be politically heated. While taxes have a direct impact on households and companies, they do not always have a straightforward effect on the overall economy and stock market. This is because taxes are only one of the factors that influence growth and returns, and there are many deductions, credits, and strategies that can reduce the statutory tax rate.

Taxes are also quite low by historical standards. This will be true whether the top marginal tax rate is 37% or 39.6%. With the growing federal debt, we believe it’s prudent for investors to expect tax rates to eventually rise, whether they do so immediately following this election or not.

One area where taxes are historically low is estate taxes, a tax imposed on the transfer of assets to heirs after death. The TCJA doubled the estate tax exemption amount, and after inflation adjustments, the level has risen to $13.6 million for 2024. Without additional action, this would revert to the pre-TCJA level, adjusted for inflation, which we estimate would be approximately $6.8 million per individual in 2026.

Although estate taxes constitute only a small portion of government revenue, and the percentage of people who are subject to estate tax is small, this has become a challenging political issue, and one that is important to many Wedmont clients. The future of estate taxes will very much depend on the results of this election, including the results of Congressional races. Regardless of future changes to the estate tax, Wedmont will continue to work with you to identify the best course of action for your family.

Global trade and tariffs will depend on the election

The candidates also differ on their potential trade policies, especially when it comes to tariffs. While the wave of deglobalization and the reshoring of manufacturing is likely to continue, how tariffs are used to increase U.S. competitiveness and generate revenue could depend on the outcome of the election. That said, President Trump’s administration enacted a number of tariffs during his time in office, most of which were continued by the Biden administration.

Tariffs were once a major factor in trade and a significant source of revenue for the U.S. government, but in recent decades they’ve played a small role. Over the past century, the formation of organizations and agreements - such as the WTO, NAFTA, the USMCA, and others - helped to ease trade barriers across major partners. Still, the use of tariffs to protect domestic industries and intellectual property, including steel, electronics, semiconductors, agricultural goods, and more, have occurred periodically.

For investors nervous about a possible trade war, it’s important to note that the same fears in 2018 and 2019 did not lead to the worst-case scenarios that some predicted. The economy remained strong during this period, with unemployment and inflation near historic lows, even though it was quite late in the business cycle. Eventually, ongoing negotiations between key trading partners helped to mitigate some fears. As the accompanying chart shows, throughout different trade regimes, the U.S. has maintained a trade deficit with many countries.

The economy has grown under both major parties

When it comes down to it, history shows that the economy has grown under both political parties and bull markets have occurred regardless of who occupied the White House. Although it may seem counterintuitive, this is because politics often has a small impact on the economy and markets. Specifically, the business cycle and broad trends such as the growth of artificial intelligence and technology advancements, falling inflation, and the strong job market matter far more.

Despite the perceived importance of this election, policy changes also tend to be gradual due to checks and balances in our political system. What candidates promise on the campaign trail can differ from what they can actually enact.

When it comes to taxes, neither candidate is proposing a return to pre-Reagan era tax levels when the top marginal rates reached as high as 94%. When it comes to trade, tariffs may increase but they are unlikely to reach the levels experienced almost a century ago during the Great Depression. It’s important to keep these facts in perspective when planning for the next four years.

The election matters for many reasons, but its long-term impact on the stock market and economy is often overestimated. The economy has grown under Democrats and Republicans alike, and it’s important for investors to maintain perspective this election season.